"Hey, it is what anarchists do."

That just made me think of something. Is it just me, or does anyone else here find the typical Socialist Anarchy to be completely contradictory?

Without success, there can be no failure. Therefore, to put an end to failure, we must put an end to success.

/libtard logic

Here's my two cents because I don't know what to choose. A lot of these students want as good a chance to be sucessful as everyone else. They know they aren't born to be rich, so they went to college and got the education to get a good job, only to find there is no jobs. Also the ones coming up on college are trying to follow that path and find there are no loans because the banks will not lend. There is no incentive for them. I'm just tired of both sides not willing to compromise. Both sides have good points, but nothing will get done if one side holds the less fortunate for hostages.

Obama said it so it must be a good idea!

In what way are we tearing down the successful? And could you please define "successful"? Do you mean money wise or something else?