And George Bush was so much better. Also remember it was republicans who shut the government down out of spite and then tried to blame Obama because they lack the balls to stand up and say "We believe Obama Care is so bad that we are willing to put thousands of people out of work and risk lossing are jobs too stop it." If they did that then maybe I could respect them even if I didn't agree with them.
No, our current health care is a model of unsustainable redistribution since without ObamaCare increasing the number of people who use Medicare and making sure that those who do not use health insurance pay a penalty, the cost of those people going to the emergency room would keep being placed on the backs of tax payers. And don't give me that crap about people not needing health insurance, everyone will eventually need to see a doctor once in their lives.
Also George Bush was the retarded love child between a monkey an a conservative.
Saying "all libs want to ban guns" is as idiotic as me saying "all conservatives hate black people." I hate guns, but wouldn't take away anybody's right to protect themselves with them.
There is simply never any reason why you should be allowed to own one that can penetrate a wall or shoot dozens of bullets a second. Why would you need an assault rifle to protect yourself from a mugger? Even if THEY have one, a simple handgun gives you exactly the same chance of stopping them in their tracks.
And you have completely backwards priorities, don't you?
Have you any idea how rarely people are attacked and killed by large animals in general, let alone specifically bears? Most animal attacks are by dogs and most animal-related deaths are from venom.
I can't believe you brought up BEARS as an argument for owning assault weapons at all. That's the kind of argument I'd expect in a cartoon as an outrageous parody of logic. There haven't been enough bear-related deaths in all of history to justify giving the average American access to that much firepower.
I brought up bears because that is what assault rifles are mainly used for. That, and lions, elk, and other such large game.
Of course large game attacks that result in a kill are frequent, but most people up in the north-west states probably don't want to take any chances, hmm?
Oh, and handguns won't do any good against a gun with a high rate of fire unless you have perfect aim and the quickest finger known to man. Even then one shot wouldn't do it.
Now, I assume you couldn't understand that I was joking in a way. I did not feel like getting into a full-out-fucking-debate over such a matter. Great. Now, I am tired and do not feel like arguing when you couldn't tell I wasn't specifically saying just bears attack. I thought the humour would be lost if I typed out every animal that would need a high-powered weapon to defend against.